Тип пола: Клеевой. Ширина (мм): 305. Длина (мм): 915. Покрытие: Предлакировка. Тип покрытия: Hot Coating. Верхний слой: Пробка. Фотопечать: Да. Тип фаски: Отсутствует. Замок: Отсутствует. Цвет: Серый. Размер упаковки (кв. м): 3.36. Количество штук в упаковке: 12. Толщина: 6 мм. Фаска: Без фаски
Тип пола: Замковый. Ширина (мм): 305. Длина (мм): 915. Покрытие: Лак. Тип покрытия: Hot Coating. Верхний слой: Пробка. Фотопечать: Да. Тип фаски: Отсутствует. Замок: Uniclic. Цвет: Мультиколор. Размер упаковки (кв. м): 1.68. Количество штук в упаковке: 6. Толщина: 11 мм. Фаска: Без фаски
The demand for college continues to rise. However, there is a decline in graduation rates in most parts of the world. What is causing so many young people to choose college but fail to complete? Another question to ask is what leads young people to develop the intention to complete college. This book examines the factors that increases a person's intention to complete college. Intention is the conscious decision to desire to achieve a goal and precedes the behavior. Understanding these factors can help educators to known what aspects of a young person's life needs to be tap in order to potentially increase the odds that a student will achieve their dream of completing college
Revision with unchanged content. In the interest of rigorous reasoning about agents and their interaction with environments, much work has been devoted to characterizing the nature of intention and its role in cognition and action. Logicians and computer scientists have developed numerous formal systems capturing various aspects of the philosophically established desiderata for a notion of intention. Philip Cohen and Hector Levesque give perhaps the most famous and venerable formal logic of intention in their paper “Intention Is Choice with Commitment.” However, Munindar Singh has given a profound criticism of that theory, showing, among other things, that under the theory agents can bring about their intentions simply by virtue of having them without necessarily taking action. This work presents an amended version of the original logic, which preserves the advantages of the original while addressing Singh’s criticisms. The motivations for the amendments reveal an oft-ignored desiderata for intention: that action is not intended for its own sake, but rather for an intended outcome. This work is addressed to logicians and computer scientists interested in the formalization of rational agency.
Theory of Mind (ToM) defines the ability to understand other peoples’ behaviour and emotions by understanding their mental states such as beliefs or intentions. In ToM research there is an interesting developmental course: When someone’s intention is fulfilled, 2- to 3-year-olds attribute good emotions to the other, and they attribute bad emotions when his or her intention is not fulfilled. This process is defined as intention-based emotion attribution. Things get complicated in the case of fulfilled immoral intentions. While 4- to 5-year-olds ignore the immoral aspect by solely attributing “happy victimizer” emotions to the other, 6- to 7-year-olds attribute mixed emotions: A fulfilled intention makes someone feel good; but the moral rule violation also causes bad feelings. By using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in adults this work investigated neural networks of intention-based emotion attribution, and revealed common neural activity associated with non-immoral (neutral) and immoral intentions. This indicates that the development of neutral and immoral intention understanding might be associated with the maturation of common rather than distinct brain regions.